Comparison with the dialect used in [#!SICP!#]

Compare with S&ICP: simple renamings like print; easily implemented things like cons-stream; more grave and controversial omissions like eval and make-environment.

Move cwcc history back here? — Andy Cromarty is concerned about confusion over who the audience is.

Cromarty: 23. NOTES, p.35ff.: This material should stay somehow. We need to make it clear that R3 Scheme is not being touted as Yet Another Ultimate Solution To The Programming Language Problem, but rather as a snapshot of a *process* of good design, for which not all answers have yet been found. We also ought to use the opportunity for publicity afforded us by SIGPLAN to advertise some of the thorny unsolved problems that need further research, and encourage language designers to work on them.